The Collection

A Landscape and River Scene

Abraham Pether

A Landscape and River Scene


License this image



Tab Label (see title)
ArtistAbraham Pether (1756-1812)
TitleA Landscape and River Scene
MediumOil on canvas
Dimensionsheight: 43.50 cm, width: 39.00 cm
AcquisitionPurchased from Puttick & Simpson, November 1949
LocationOther, other locations abroad,
GAC number1005
 

Other works by this artist

View All

LandscapeLandscape

Oil on canvas

1806

GAC 3704

Windsor Castle by MoonlightWindsor Castle by Moonlight

Oil on canvas

1809

GAC 6500

Landscape with River and Cows at DuskLandscape with River and Cows at Dusk

Oil on canvas

1796

GAC 6825

A Castle and Lake by MoonlightA Castle and Lake by Moonlight

Oil on canvas

GAC 7253

Claybury Hall, EssexClaybury Hall, Essex

Oil on canvas

c.1800

GAC 975

Tab Label (see title)
Tab Label (see title)

This work contains the following subjects; choose a subject below to cross-refer to other works in the collection:

Similar works by subject:

house

View all

Image not yet available

Capri: Sunrise

Oil on canvas

1859

GAC 0/46

The Valley of MexicoThe Valley of Mexico

Oil on canvas

1837

GAC 0/55

Brazilian Scene: A Sugar MillBrazilian Scene: A Sugar Mill

Oil on panel

c.1665

GAC 0/61

Brazilian SceneBrazilian Scene

Oil on canvas

c.1665

GAC 0/62

Landscape with FiguresLandscape with Figures

watercolour on silk

GAC 0/68

Tab Label (see title)
Tab Label (see title)
Tab Label (see title)

Abraham Pether

Abraham Pether, a cousin of the painter William Pether, was born at Chichester and as a child showed a talent for music. However, he later became a pupil of the painter George Smith. His works mainly depict river and mountain scenery, often with classical buildings, although it was his popular moonlit views that inspired the nickname ‘Moonlight Pether’. He exhibited frequently at the Royal Academy and Free Society of Artists. Despite some success Pether was never able to do more than provide for the basic needs of his wife and children. Towards the end of his life he was incapacitated by disease. The Artist’s Benevolent Fund faced severe criticism for not supporting his family after the artist’s death, despite their acute poverty.